Essay about Nikola Tesla - 877 Words

Tesla was born in Smiljan, Austria-Hungary (now Croatia) on July 9, 1856. He studied engineering at two institutions in Austria-Hungary--Graz Technical University (now in Austria) and the University of Prague (now in the Czech Republic). Tesla left the University of Prague in 1880, without a degree, after his father died. He then worked for a short time for Austria-Hungarys telephone system in Budapest (now in Hungary). In 1882, Tesla moved to Paris, where he worked for the Continental Edison Company. While at Graz Technical University, Tesla had seen a demonstration of a generator run as a direct-current (DC) motor. Direct current is electric current that flows in only one direction. During the demonstration, the brushes and the†¦show more content†¦There, he produced three complete systems of AC machinery. For each system, Tesla designed generators to supply the current, motors that use the current, transformers to raise and lower voltages, and a variety of devices to automatically control the machinery. Tesla received patents for his polyphase system of AC generators, transformers, and motors in 1888. That same year, he sold his patents to U.S. industrialist George Westinghouse. Tesla then worked at the Westinghouse Electric Company in Pittsburgh for a year to help develop commercial uses of the AC system. Tesla became a U.S. citizen in 1889. In 1893, Westinghouse used Teslas AC system to light the Worlds Columbian Exposition in Chicago. In 1895, Westinghouses Niagara Falls Power Project used Teslas generators and motors to harness the power of the waterfall. In 1891, Tesla invented the Tesla coil, a type of high-frequency transformer that is still used in radio and television transmission. He experimented with wireless control, and, in 1898, he demonstrated a radio-controlled boat he had invented. In 1899, Tesla created artificial lightning in one of his laboratories. Teslas other achievements include early experiments with X-rays and radar, aircraft design, and the invention of neon and fluorescent lighting. Tesla was also a great mechanical engineer, and created dozens of devices ranging from speedometers to extremely efficient electrical generators. OneShow MoreRelatedNikola Tesla Essay1550 Words   |  7 PagesNikola Tesla was born midnight on July 10, 1856, in Smiljan, Lika, which at that time was part of the Austrian-Hungarian Empire, which is now known as Croatia. His father was named Milutin Tesla and he was a Serbian Orthodox Priest. Djuka Mandic was his mother and she invented household appliances. Tesla was the fourth child of five, having one older brother and three younger sisters. In 1873, Tesla studied at the the Polytechnic Institute in Graz, Austria and the University of Prague. At firstRead More Nikola Tesla Essay1590 Words   |  7 Pagesthings, but I bet it wont give any mention of a man by the name of Nikola Tesla. In fact, I bet they wont give much mention of Tesla for any of the many things he invented. We can thank Thomas Edison for this. Nikola Tesla was born in Smiljian, Croatia at precisely midnight on July 9/10, 1856. Not a lot is known about his early childhood. His father was an orthodox priest, and his mother, though unschooled, was highly intelligent. Tesla had an extraordinary memory, and he spoke six languages. He SpentRead MoreEssay On Nikola Tesla1458 Words   |  6 PagesNikola Tesla (1856-1943) was an inventor and is responsible for the world as we know it. He developed alternating current, the Tesla coil, and wireless connectivity. Today he is regarded as one of the most important geniuses in history, but while he was alive, his ideas were largely unsupported. Tesla was born in Smiljan, Yugoslavia (modern-day Croatia) on July 10, 1856. He went to primary school, where he learned subjects such as arithmetic, religion, and German. From a very early age, Tesla wasRead MoreNikola Tesla Essay845 Words   |  4 PagesNikola Tesla was born midnight on July 10, 1856 in Smiljan, Lika, which was then part of the Austo-Hungarian Empire, region of Croatia. His father was named Milutin Tesla and was a Serbian Orthodox Priest. Djuka Mandic was his mother and was an inventor in her own right of household appliances. Tesla was the fourth child of five, having one older brother and 3 younger sisters. Tesla studied at the Realschule, Karlstadt in 1873, the Polytechnic Institute in Graz, Austria and the University of PragueRead MoreEssay Nikola Tesla1035 Words   |  5 PagesNikola Tesla is regarded as one of the most brilliant inventors in history. His work provided the basis for the modern alternating current power system, as well as having developed bo th radio and the fluorescent light bulb. He worked with Thomas Edison and George Westinghouse, among others. He was also widely misunderstood by his peers and the public at large. Biography Nikola Tesla was born in a small town called Smiljan, in what is now Croatia, during a lightning storm. Some would say thatRead MoreBiography of Nikola Tesla 1054 Words   |  4 PagesNikola Tesla is undoubtedly one of the most influential scientists of all time. He was born on July 10th, 1856 in Smiljan, Lika; at this time, Smiljan was located in the Austro-Hungarian Empire region of Croatia. Tesla was thought to be one of the very few people who possessed an eidetic, or photographic, memory. He had numerous ideas for possible inventions, which he almost never felt the need to write down. In his lifetime he registered more than seven hundred patents around the world.2 Some ofRead More Nikola Tesla Essay1059 Words   |  5 Pages Nikola Tesla Few people recognize his name today, and even among those who do, the words Nikola Tesla are likly to summon up the image of a crackpot rather than an authentic scientist. Nikola Tesla was possibly the greatest inventor the world has ever known. He was, without doubt, a genius who is not only credited with many devices we use today, but is also credited with astonishing, sometimes world-transforming, devices that are even simply amazing by todays scientific standards. Tesla was bornRead More Nikola Tesla Essay1355 Words   |  6 PagesBorn in 1856 the son of an Orthodox priest in Smiljan, Croatia, Nikola Tesla had an early exposure to inventing. His mother, although unschooled, was a very intelligent woman who often created appliances that helped with home and farm responsibilities, such as a mechanical eggbeater. Young Nikola was schooled at home during his early years and later attended a school in Carlstadt, Croatia. He soon developed advanced skills such as doing calculus integrals in his head. He very deeply wantedRead MoreEssay On Nikola Tesla1801 Words   |  8 PagesNikola Tesla was an inventor, electrical engineer, futurist, mechanical engineer and physicist. He is the original inventor of the alternative currents which revolutionize the way we use electricity. He made countless more inventions like remote controls, wireless telegraph, neon lamps, three-phase electric power. Many people think that Thomas Edison made electricity available to us which he did for a while but it was very dangerous, however Nokia Tesla was the true inventor that provided us withRead MoreNikola Tesla Essay1096 Words   |  5 PagesNikola Tesla I do not think there is any thrill that can go through the human heart like that felt by the inventor as he sees some creation of the brain unfolding to success... such emotions make a man forget food, sleep, friends, love, everything. Nikola Tesla Few people know his name today, and even those who do the words Nikola Tesla are likely to come up with the image of a crackpot rather than an authentic scientist. Nikola Tesla was possibly the greatest inventor the world

Title of Paper Free Essays

â€Å"Although his name is hardly a household word, the ghost of Jay M. Near still stalks most U.S. We will write a custom essay sample on Title of Paper or any similar topic only for you Order Now courtrooms.   There exists no plaque that bears his name†¦.Near is truy the unknown soldier in the continuing struggle between the powers of government and the power of the press to publish the news.†Ã‚   (Friendly, 172) Fred Friendly, journalist, wrote of the struggle men, such as Jay M. Near, fought in their determination to live the American dream.   Their dream may not be acknowledged by the general public, but Near and his peers were trying to live the rights bestowed upon them as Americans.   Among those rights were the right to free speech, and freedom of the press. The reason Near is not a household name is because his cause may not have been seen by many to be noble.   If fought today, his cause or his dream would be likened to that of The Enquirer or The Star.   In fact, Friendly, in Minnesota Rag:   Corruption, Yellow Journalism, and the Case That Saved Freedom of The Press,   described Near vs. Minnesota, as a cast that placed freedom of the press in the least favorable light. Minnesota Rag, by Fred Friendly, traces the roots of this case all the way back to Duluth, Minnesota, beginning with a man by the name of James Morrison, who edited the Rip-Saw.   Morrison is described as a self-righteous man, willing to do anything to prove his point.   He saw a need in Duluth to expose the lawmakers for what they were.   It was a time of prohibition and Morrison saw failure in politicians and corruption in the police.   The Rip-Saw, as described by Friendly, was relentless.   â€Å"Once it had a victim in its sights, it didn’t stop until its prey was wounded.†Ã‚   (Friendly, 8) The Rip-Saw became a popular success.   The prohibition had been a failure and opened the door for Morrison to attack.   He ran storied of gambling dens increasing, prostitution and politicians, but did so under the guise of moral decency, which led the general public to believe him and the Rip-Saw.   The business sector did not have as much faith in Morrison or the Rip-Saw.   They accused him or trying to force businesses to buy advertising in order to eliminate the risk of gossip. Morrison was a single man trying to affect an entire community into believing and acting on his morals.   He had identified what he thought was just and decent and insisted that the rest of the community live by his law, or be punished.   His punishment was to be published as a headline in his paper in a non-flattering and often libelous manner.   He took it upon himself to judge the morals of others.   Morrison had an impact on local elections with the stories he printed, whether true or untrue. When finally brought to court on charges of libel, Morrison was found guilty.   Morrison immediately appealed the decision and six months later was ordered to make a public apology.   By that time, Morrison had already won, as the Mayor Power he had so maliciously written about had lost his election.   Morrison issued an apology, but certainly in jest as he had already accomplished what he had set out to do. Having accomplished such a feat, two other politicians, Boylan and Lommen, who had been lambasted in the Rip-Saw, determined that this type of press was unacceptable and formed legislation prohibiting publications that were producing â€Å"malicious, scandalous, and defamatory material.†Ã‚   (Friendly, 20)   This legislation is what would become known as the Public Nuisance Bill of 1925, often referred to as the â€Å"gag law.† â€Å"Any person who†¦.shall be engaged in the business of regularly or customarily producing, publishing or circulating, having in possession, selling or giving away, (a)  Ã‚  Ã‚   an obscene, lewd and lascivious newspaper, magazine or other periodical, or (b)  Ã‚   a malicious, scandalous and defamatory newspaper is guilty of nuisance.† This law enabled a single judge to prevent the publication of anything they believed or considered to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, or malicious, scandalous and defamatory.   Press coverage of this bill was almost non-existent and yet it had the largest impact on their business.   America, founded on freedom and liberty, was now going to allow the fate of individuals to rest in the hands of one judge, and his beliefs.   This judgment went against everything that our laws our founded on.   This wouldn’t go down without a fight. Minneapolis, Minnesota was vastly affected by the prohibition as well.   Friendly described it as a crossroads in the Canadian whiskey trade.   From Minneapolis it could be shipped to Chicago and St. Louis.   Some journalists in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area described both the politicians and law enforcement as being on the take.   Minneapolis was known as a town of gambling, illegal booze and prostitution, plagued by gang killings.   Friendly describes many of the journalists of respectable newspapers as looking the other way.   They chose not to get involved.   Enter Morrison’s successor, Jay M. Near. Near is not described as a man of conscience or character, but a man who was looking to profit, in any way he saw fit.   Again, this is likely why his name is not a household term.   Near and his partner Guilford, began a crusade against local authorities, including the chief of police.   Their publication The Saturday Press took aim at the local authorities.   Their implications tied the police to the local gambling syndicates and further accused the police of extorting money from local businesses. Brunskill, the chief of police had ordered an official ban of the paper from all newsstands in Minneapolis, on the basis that it would corrupt the morals of children.   Brunskill threatened arrest of anyone who would be selling the paper, which made Near fight harder.   Near and his cohorts promised legal aid and bail to anyone who would willingly sell the paper.   It was a political and racial fight from beginning to end.   Near, who was anti-Catholic, anti-Semitic, anti-black, anti-labor, would find support in the Jewish community to further his cause.   Never the less, The Saturday Press was eventually closed and padlocked. The United States, a country founded on freedom, had caused the creation of a number of civic unions that would fight for a cause, whether they believed in it or not.   They were fighting for freedom, yours, mine and theirs.   Near had found a way to reach out to the American Civil Liberties Union, and although they did not agree with his publication, they agreed with his right to publish it.   Near was also joined by Robert Rutherford McCormick, publisher of the Chicago Tribune.   McCormick joined the battle because of his belief in the First Amendment. They joined forces in order to fight the Public Nuisance Law and to support Freedom of the Press.   They did not all agree on the purpose of that freedom or how it should be used, but that it should be present for everyone.   They had determined that no one man should have the right to quiet the voice of another, despite their difference in opinion, and they took their case to the Supreme Court. Weymouth Kirkland, appellant’s counsel, in his address to the court, asserted that the Minnesota law violated the United States Constitution by restricting freedom of the press.   Kirkland admitted that the articles were defamatory, but added, â€Å"So long as men do evil, so long will newspapers publish defamation.†Ã‚   (Friendly, 126)   Kirkland concluded that every man has the right to publish malicious, scandalous and defamatory matter, even if untrue and with bad motives. (127) They may be dealt with after the publication of such matter, but no one has the right to prevent such publication.   Kirkland’s point was that the Minnesota gag law was a method of permanent censorship, however criminal proceedings on a specific complaint were always available to the state.   (128)   The Supreme Court ruled in Near’s favor. According to Friendly, Near vs. Minnesota, placed freedom of the press in the least favorable light.   (172)   Near’s cause did not appear to be significant or even just, except by those that choose to fight this battle.   To those who fought the battle it created a â€Å"sturdy† law.   â€Å"If great cases like hard cases make bad law, as the Holmes proverb warns, it may follow that since few knew or cared about Near’s cause, freedom of the press was transformed successfully into a twentieth-century constitutional bulwark.†Ã‚   (Friendly, 173) Had this case never been heard, we may be left with the inability to question our government or local authorities today.   We live in a democratic society, where we have been granted certain unalienable rights, among them the right to freedom of speech and freedom of the press.   Without those options, the press would be unable to publish stories of certain unflattering truths about our elected officials.   We would be unable to make informed decisions. â€Å"Both the history and language of the First Amendment support the view that the press must be left to publish news, whatever the source, without censorship, injunctions, or prior restraint.   Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government.† (Friendly, 176) Near vs. Minnesota and the case of Morrison and the Rip-Saw, either story seems hard pressed to point to a great law that would emerge from the scandals.   But to leave the Public Nuisance Law in place, to limit the freedom of the press, would ultimately result in a restraint upon the freedom of the general public.   If the press cannot print what they learn, then our democracy is dissolved. â€Å"But, history, fate, or whatever fore it is that provides the unlikely champion, or the subtle, improbably turn of events that leaves its indelible stamp upon the course of human events, intervened.   It was one such incident that ultimately empowered five Supreme Court Justices to infuse with life and spirit and amendment which for 150 years had existed only as a bare skeleton.†Ã‚   (Friendly, 179)                                  How to cite Title of Paper, Essay examples

The Analysis of the Novel The Death of Ivan Ilych Essay Sample free essay sample

Introduction Thesis Statement: The novel ofLeo Tolstoy1981 entitledThe Death of Ivan Ilychhas provided several statements that sprung up throughout several reviews and analysis that occurred together with the literary piece. The primarysubjectof the fresh involves the chief status of decease as it comes near a individual and the procedure of accepting. interacting. and populating in a status wherein decease apparently knocks near. Thesecret planbad lucks that were experienced by the supporter of the narrative. Ivan Ilych. implicates a ramifying political orientations from assorted facets of elements. such as faith. literary reviews. societal scientific disciplines. doctrine of decease. etc. As for the analysis of the novel. the primary focusedelementsinvolves the facet of decease in its nucleus credence and the premier symbolic attributes specifically pain and decease itself. Furthermore. the analysis of the paper farther extends to the scenario of the characters. Gerasim. and the household. which someway provided the primary conflicting parties throughout the literary piece. Obviously. the class of the narrative is in line with the facets of mourning and heartache ; nevertheless. the primary sarcasm involved is how did the facet of deceasing became the way towards the visible radiation and enjoyment Body The novel starts in the character of Ivan Ilych Golovin who significantly plays portion in the justness system of St. Petersburg as a high tribunal justice. During the life of Ivan Ilych. prosperity and celebrity had been portion of the ever-existing kin inclined in political personal businesss. such as the paternal line of descent of Ivan. granted that they have served St. Petersburg in a chiseled mode. The household of Ivan Ilych comprises of political forces from Ilya Epimovich Golovin. who was a councilor. Ilych’s household of beginning did branched out in a well-famed and recognized persons ( her sister married a baron. and his senior brother sought the stairss of his male parent ) . Ilych averagely lived a normal yet important life as a Member of Court of Justice even though he was expected by his male parent as thele phenix de la familleor pride of the household. The powers enveloped in the appreciation of this attorney were negated at the clip of great anomalousness th at had occurred. The focal point of Ilych’s life remained in the sense of good workss for the community. for the spiritual religious orders. and for his household ( Schwehn and Bass 2006 492 ) . One clip. the ordinary life of Ilych was disrupted by immense hurting happening in his side. Apparently. the good workss did non saved him from the diagnosing of the physicians. which states that the status nowadays in him is terminal. and decease was approaching towards him. Ilych was devastated and resort to inquiries of meriting such faith sing the unsloped life that he ordained to himself ; hence. he began interrupting the usual impulse of the atmosphere. being ill-mannered even to his household. and much worst. to himself. However. the conditions of Ilych’s positions shifted as he met one of the symbolic figure established in Gerasim. who somehow taught Ilych the sarcasm of unreal life and reliable life. Upon the decease of the justice. the plot line branches out into assorted sentiments expressed by different characters. Fedor Vasilievich. Peter Ivanovich. and other members of the tribunal justness were keenly reasoning and anticipating the publicities brought by the decease of Ilych ( Danaher. 2007 ) . The construct of heartache and mourning greatly entangled the position of Ivanovich and the left behind household of Ilych. which someway institutes another symbolic figure implying the negative facet of decease. At the terminal of the narrative. Ilych recognized the benefit of deceasing in a different position of being cognizant. prepared and able to see the value of life every bit good as deceasing ( Dickenson and Katz 2000 220 ) . Therefore. at the terminal of the. Ilych eventually accepted his decease. negated the facet of unreal life. and welcomed the genuineness of his new given life ( Schwehn and Bass 2006 492 ) . The primary characters involved in the novel chiefly branch out to different character. viz. the supporter. new wave Ilych Golovin and his household. Fedor Vasilievich. Peter Ivanovich. Gerasim. and Praskovya Fedorovna. Get downing with the chief supporters. Ilych Golovin. who died in February 4. 1882. became the primary point of circulation in the novel ( see www. ccel. org ) . The treatment chiefly involved the decease of Ivan as he conjured a terminal unwellness diagnosed by the physician. which greatly affected every parts of his life ( Dickenson and Katz 2000 220 ) . The kernel of being ordinary nowadays in his life has shifted into a life full of enquiries and justifications of good plants over life’s unfortunate effects. Peter Ivanovich became one of Ivan’s closest familiarities. and the two of them went to jurisprudence school together with Vasilievich. Ivanovich presents uneven attack towards the casket of Ilych sing that his chief symbol in the narrative relays in an unenlightened person. Ivanovich and Fedor Vasilievich joins the character of position-greed in the novel. as the two exclaim the desire of obtaining the vacancy left by the places of Ilych ; hence. implicating the characters of discreet adversaries. Meanwhile. the married woman of Ilych. Praskovya Fedorovna. besides play important function in the class narrative as the chief support of Ivan in footings of his unwellness ( Malpas and Solomon. 1998 6 ) . As Ivan suppress the world of being terminally ill. Fedorovna continuously instills to Ivan’s mind the world of confronting decease. â€Å"Fedorovna’s position ; nevertheless. remains centered to his hubby and non for greedy motivations. although. the act farther d epresses Ilych’s perceptual experiences over his status ( Schwehn and Bass 2006 492 ) † . Last. the character of Gerasim. whom someway. provided the features of enlightenment-bringer on the facet of Ilych’s depressive estates had greatly modified the position of Ilych over life. decease. life and deceasing ( De Sousa. 2003 ) . By demoing and standing bravely over the face of deceasing and purdah. Ilych became impressed on his position. which someway motivated Ilych to alter towards the improvement. credence. realisation of life after decease. and the belief of God and confession ( Malpas and Solomon. 1998 6 ; Schwehn and Bass 2006 492 ) . The symbolisms nowadays in the narrative explicitly interact all throughout the narrative lines. peculiarly decease. hurting and the act of confession. â€Å"Most notably apparent. Ilych’s response over the hurting had provided him the lay waste toing intelligence that disrupted the environment of mundaneness and the well-classified life that he had as a member of justness commission ( Malpas and Solomon. 1998 6 ) † . The hurting experienced by Ilych acted as the primary trigger to switch the full dimension ofordinaryto the impression of anxiousness. The agonies brought by hurting triggered the alteration and exposure of failing in Ilych’s belief of uprightness and moral bases. sing that the profession whom the character signifies was really in the field of concluding and principle ( Klement 1994 ) . Pain acted as the premier trigger to switch the atmosphere and exceed the plot line to another facet. which is confronting the facts of terminal position peculiarly. decease ( Danaher. 2007 ) . The construct of decease is deemed non merely as the primary subject of the narrative but besides play portion of the symbolical three wherein fright of decease exposes the discreet uncertainties. trial of religion. degree of enlightenment and realisation of life far more than the cognition obtained from calling or instruction ( Malpas and Solomon. 1998 6 ) . Last. the construct of confession that was or dained by Ilych with a priest after accomplishing the realisations of reliable life over the deceasing one had significantly provided the symbolical function of declaration ( Klement 1994 ) . Sing the Christian dispositions of Tolstoy. ( hurting ) triggers are deemed necessary in order for us to recognize the current terminal ( decease ) of our action while believing that the current way ( unsloped life or an ordinary life ) can salvage us from the terminal. yet merely by understanding the extreme end ( reliable life ) can assist us seek the key ( confession ) ( De Sousa. 2003 ) . The novel’s sarcasm was dispatched chiefly on the latter portion of the narrative wherein the facet of joy and credence became the point of position of Ilych as he approach the close clip of his decease. Sing that the whole clip after cognizing the terminal status of his life. the facet of life became deformed and self-pity reigned over Ilych discreetly. and yet. the result of the novel illustrated a sense of satisfaction. which is a satisfied impression from deceasing. â€Å"And the hurting? † he asked himself. â€Å"What has become of it? Where are you. trouble? †He turned his attending to it. â€Å"Yes. here it is. Well. what of it? Let the hurting be. † †¦ â€Å"And death†¦where is it? † †¦Ã¢â‚¬ So that’s what it is! † he all of a sudden exclaimed aloud. â€Å"What joy! † ( Tolstoy 1981 ) The statement provided by Ilych greatly connotes the kernel of deceasing with satisfaction. credence and exhilaration ; nevertheless. the early looks involved utmost torment and hurting over his conditions that are yet to be resolved. In some point of analysis. the sarcasm revolves in the construct of reliable life and unreal life that possess beliing perspective yet manifest the existent accounts over the sarcasm ( De Sousa. 2003 ) . Bridged by enlightenment and realisation. Ilych eventually took his spring from the ideation of unreal life and eventually give up himself towards life’s genuineness by deceasing. which is the really most dry statement of the novel. Decision In the decision of the paper. the primary subject stated involves the facet of decease and the statement of the thesis states the brotherhood of credence of decease from the fright of deceasing. Three elements have been utilized in the full class of literary analysis. chiefly the word pictures. symbolism and sarcasm. The characters in the novel. which notably revealed the captivations and chief engagements of the most of import characters of the novel. provided the model of the full events of the narrative. The symbolism instills the threes of hurting. decease and confession. which somehow suggests the spiritual deductions of the narrative as referred to both the novel and the Christian inceptions of the writer. Last. the sarcasm involved tackles the important turning over from torment of decease towards credence to the point of seeking for decease. Plants Cited Internet Resources: â€Å"Death of Ivan Ilych. † 1 Christian Classics Ethereal Library. 7 Feb. 2008 lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www. ccel. org/ccel/tolstoy/ivan. hypertext markup language gt ; . Danaher. David S. â€Å"IVAN ILYCH. † 1 2007. Encyclopedia of Death and Dying. 7 Feb. 2008 lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www. deathreference. com/Ho-Ka/Ivan-Ilych. hypertext markup language gt ; . Database Resources: Klement. Vera. â€Å"An Artist’s Notes on Aging and Death. †Art Journal. 53. 1 ( 1994 ) : 73-76.Online LIbrary. Questia Database. 7 Feb. 2008 lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www. questia. com/read/5000206040 gt ; . De Sousa. Ronald. â€Å"Perversion and Death. †The Monist. 86. 1 ( 2003 ) : 90-97.Online LIbrary. Questia Database. 7 Feb. 2008 lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www. questia. com/read/5002526428 gt ; . Print Resources: Dickenson. Donna. and Joanne Katz.Death. Dying and Bereavement. Sage. 2000. Gergen. Kenneth J. . and Mary M. Gergen.Social Construction: A Reader. Sage. 2003. Schwehn. Mark R. . and Dorothy C. Bass.Leading Lifes That Matter: What We Should Make and Who We Should Be. Eerdmans Books for Young Readers. 2006. Primary/ Book Resources: Tolstoy. Leo.The Death of Ivan Ilyich. Bantam. 1981. Malpas. J E. . and Robert C. Solomon.Death and Philosophy. Routledge. 1998.